Prediction of Jeremy Chardy [876th] vs Noah Rubin [734th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W L L L L L
Form
W L W L W W L W L LHead-To-Head: Chardy 1 - 0 Rubin
They have played 2 sets in total, with Chardy winning 2 and Rubin winning 0. The last match between Chardy and Rubin was at the Delray Beach Open - Delray Beach, 18-02-2016, Second, Hard with Jeremy Chardy getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jeremy Chardy | 1 |
| Noah Rubin | 0 |
| Chardy | Stats | Rubin |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 876 | Ranking | 734 |
| 25 | Highest Rank | 125 |
| 38 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 8 | Titles | 4 |
| 54% (494-426) | Career Total W/L | 56% (215-169) |
| $5,487,593 | Career Prize Money | $398,175 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Noah Rubin
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
6
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:10:41 | Average Match Time | 1:10:41 |
| 49% (26/53) | 1st Serve % | 57% (36/63) |
| 73% (19/26) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (19/36) |
| 48% (13/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (12/27) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (2/6) |
| 51% (32/63) | Return Points Win % | 40% (21/53) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jeremy Chardy vs Noah Rubin Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Chardy 1 - 0 Rubin
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chardy has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Rubin has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chardy, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Rubin has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chardy has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rubin has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chardy has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Rubin winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chardy has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 210/ 162), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 152/ 146). Rubin has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 59/ 43), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 113/ 92).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chardy winning 1 times and Rubin being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Chardy winning 2 and Rubin winning 0. The last match between Chardy and Rubin was at the Delray Beach Open - Delray Beach, 18-02-2016, Second, Hard with Jeremy Chardy getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:10:41.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chardy and Rubin have played a deciding set 0 times, with Chardy winning 0 times and Rubin 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Chardy winning 0, and Rubin 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chardy has played against opponents with an average rank of while Rubin has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chardy has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rubin has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chardy has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rubin has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Jeremy Chardy Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Jeremy Chardy
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
18 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
63
|
6-0 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Jeremy Chardy
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Jeremy Chardy
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Gaston
Player
Jeremy Chardy
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Jeremy Chardy
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
8
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
18 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
61%
(
96 of
157)
1st Serve %
60%
(
73 of
122)
7
Aces
2
14
Double Faults
4
68%
(
65 of
96)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
45 of
73)
43%
(
26 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
19%
(
5 of
26)
42%
(
66 of
157)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
55 of
122)
146
Total Points Won
133
|
1-6 7-5 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Jeremy Chardy
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
77 of
120)
17
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
54 of
67)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
55 of
77)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
23 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
120)
118
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(5) 7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Jeremy Chardy
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
6
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
6
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Jeremy Chardy
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
11
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Liam Broady
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
70%
(
76 of
108)
11
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
2
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
106)
105
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Noah Rubin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Pokorny
Player
Noah Rubin
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
112)
9
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
112)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
1-6 7-6(3) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Noah Rubin
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Matija Pecotic
60%
(
66 of
110)
1st Serve %
53%
(
56 of
105)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
7
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
46 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
106
|
5-7 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Noah Rubin
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Peter Bertran
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Elio Jose Ribeiro Lago
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Tracy
Player
Noah Rubin
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
78%
(
83 of
106)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
52 of
83)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
29 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(5) 6-4 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Kyle Kang
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Domingues
Player
Noah Rubin
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
93)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
93)
83
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Vadym Ursu
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Chardy vs Rubin?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Chardy Vs Rubin is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (494/426) | Win/Loss | 56% (215/169) |
| 52% (1192/1104) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (484/408) |
| 51% (11514/11225) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (4319/4110) |
| 0.53 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 5879 | Aces Total | 1080 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 2992 | Total Double Faults | 940 |
| 1:6:5 | Average Match Time | 1:15:29 |
| 476.35 | Average Opponent Rank | 543.19 |
| 60% (34586/57422) | 1st Serve % | 60% (13176/21888) |
| 74% (25688/34586) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (8955/13176) |
| 50% (11346/22829) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (4394/8712) |
| 38% (1788/4647) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (894/2089) |
| 36% (20386/57044) | Return Points Win % | 39% (8443/21613) |
| 54% (432/795) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (207/363) |
| 49% (57/116) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 29% (5/17) |
| 49% (208/425) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (63/110) |
| 56% (165/297) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (61/107) |
| 86% (458/393) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (218/182) |
| 14% (458/64) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (218/36) |
| 22% (460/99) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (166/32) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
